Cannon Trading Podcast

Pre Market Briefing

Cannon Trading Inc. Season 1 Episode 6

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 11:06

War Day 34 — Trump: “Extremely Hard” — Dow −608 At Lows — WTI Peaks $114 — IEA: “In April, There Is Nothing” — BofA Stagflation Call

SPEAKER_01

Welcome to the deep dive. You know, um, today is April 2nd, 2026, and we are officially on War Day 34 of what they're calling Operation Epic Fury.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, and it's uh it's a severe global moment. We are watching the exact hour a global supply chain functionally dies.

SPEAKER_01

Right. I mean, the world didn't just lose a few shipping lanes overnight. It literally lost 12 million barrels of oil a day.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Which is, I mean, the models that usually govern global finance, they're just simply breaking down under the weight of this physical reality.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Exactly. So to help you make sense of this totally unprecedented landscape, our guide today is a really critical pre-market briefing straight from the Canon Intelligence Desk.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Authored by Eli Levy.

SPEAKER_01

Right, Eli Levy of Canon Trading Company. And the whole mission of this deep dive is to decode the difference between, you know, everyday market noise and catastrophic structural economic shifts.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Because the distance between a geopolitical headline and a cascading financial crisis is well, it's much shorter than most people realize.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell It really is. Now, before we jump into the timeline of what broke the markets overnight, I um I want to set a clear parameter for our discussion today.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, that's important to clarify.

SPEAKER_01

The intelligence briefing we're analyzing, it covers some highly politically charged statements and military actions from President Trump. And for our purposes today, we are treating these statements strictly as data inputs. Right. Neither we nor this show endorses any left-wing or right-wing political viewpoints. We are strictly and impartially reporting the factual contents of the briefing to help you understand the market implications. No politics, just the mechanics.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, because you know, trading algorithms and global supply chains, they really don't care about political leanings. They only care about probability and physical barriers.

SPEAKER_01

Which is exactly what we're going to measure today. And to kick things off properly, I am required to share this disclosure with you. Disclaimer. Trading futures, options on futures, and retail off exchange foreign currency transactions and other financial instruments involve substantial risk of loss and are not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Carefully consider if trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances, knowledge, and financial resources. You may lose all or more of your initial investment. Opinions, market data, and recommendations are subject to change at any time.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, so if we look at what triggered the brutal psychological whiplash in the markets yesterday, we really have to look at how financial markets price the future.

SPEAKER_01

Because the details of the reaction are staggering. We saw the Dow fall 608 points intraday. Yeah. We watched WTI crude spike to like$113 to$113 a barrel. South Korea's Cosby index dropped almost four and a half percent.

SPEAKER_00

Just massive, violent moves.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Right. And this was all triggered by President Trump's Wednesday night address. He promised to hit Iran um extremely hard over the next two to three weeks and warned he would bring them back to the Stone Ages.

SPEAKER_00

And critically, there was no exit strategy provided for the Strait of Hormuz, plus a third aircraft carrier was deployed.

SPEAKER_01

I mean it's like pulling the fire alarm right when everyone thought the fire drill was over. Why did a single speech trigger such a violent reaction across the board?

SPEAKER_00

Well, what's fascinating here is the dynamic of hope versus reality.

SPEAKER_01

Oh, interesting. How so?

SPEAKER_00

Going into Wednesday, traders and like algorithmic models had actually started pricing in a de-escalation rally. They were looking at back channels and assigning a probability that things would cool off.

SPEAKER_01

Ah, so they had hope priced in.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. And when you price in hope, bond yields relax, equities go up, oil stabilizes. But Trump's speech didn't just, you know, lower that hope. It took the probability of de-escalation to absolute zero.

SPEAKER_01

A total repricing kite.

SPEAKER_00

Right. The market collectively realized that the conflict premium isn't some temporary spike, it's the new baseline.

SPEAKER_01

But wait, I am struggling to understand something that happened mid-session. The briefing talks about this binary question and a false hope.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, the monitoring protocol headline.

SPEAKER_01

Right. A headline crosses the wire saying Iran and Oman are drafting a monitoring protocol for the Strait of Horn Moose, and suddenly the market bounces. Like, wait, isn't monitoring a good thing? Why did the algorithms fall for that?

SPEAKER_00

Because of how automated CTA funds work, commodity trading advisors. They scan for keywords like protocol or monitoring, and they just mechanically execute trades.

SPEAKER_01

So it's totally disconnected from the physical reality.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Completely. I mean, Halima Croft of RBC Capital Markets shut that optimism down perfectly.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell What did she say?

SPEAKER_00

She basically pointed out that monitoring is not permitting. Having a security camera in a dark alley doesn't stop a mugging, you know.

SPEAKER_01

Oh wow. It just records it.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. Until a tenger actually transits safely, the structural supply shock hasn't changed. Energy markets need actions, not words.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Which bridges us perfectly to the physical reality. The IEA's warning about the April supply cliff.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. Fatih Bureau's statement was just stark.

SPEAKER_01

Trevor Burrus, Jr.: Stark is an understatement. The executive director of the IEA literally said, in April, there is nothing.

SPEAKER_00

It's terrifying.

SPEAKER_01

We are talking about a loss of 12 million barrels of oil per day. I mean, for context, if you combine the 1973 and 1979 oil crises, those lost about five million barrels combined. We're at twelve.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, it alters the math of global civilization.

SPEAKER_01

I keep thinking about it like this. In March, the world was like a family eating the canned goods they bought before a blizzard.

SPEAKER_00

That's a great analogy. Pre-war cargoes were still arriving.

SPEAKER_01

Right. The stuff that passed through before the war was still on the ocean, slowly docking. But now in April, the pantry is empty and the grocery store is officially closed.

SPEAKER_00

And if we connect this to the bigger picture, the IEA is considering a second strategic reserve release.

SPEAKER_01

On top of the record, 400 million barrels already pledged.

SPEAKER_00

Right. But honestly, it only buys time. It's an inventory drain, not new production.

SPEAKER_01

So it doesn't solve the math?

SPEAKER_00

Not at all. You can't fix a missing 12 million barrels a day by just draining the reserves faster. Eventually you run out.

SPEAKER_01

And a missing 12 million barrels of oil a day. Um that doesn't stay just an energy problem for long. It fundamentally breaks the broader economy.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell, which brings us to the economic contagion.

SPEAKER_01

Yes. Bank of America's stagflation call.

SPEAKER_00

The macroeconomics team just published the first official stagflation forecast from a major bank.

SPEAKER_01

So slower growth, higher inflation, and they're projecting oil above$100 per barrel through year end 2026.

SPEAKER_00

And the Fed is completely stuck near 100% probability of an April pause.

SPEAKER_01

So what does this all mean for the average person's portfolio? Like how does a stagflation environment actually play out?

SPEAKER_00

Well, it's textbook stagflation. Tech and growth stocks get absolutely crushed.

SPEAKER_01

Because the inflation eats their future earnings.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. A dollar they promise to make 10 years from now is worth way less today. And airlines get hit directly united and Southwest are already down because jet fuel costs are destroying their margins.

SPEAKER_01

Ouch. So where is the defense? Is there anywhere to hide?

SPEAKER_00

The only real defense is energy stocks like XLE, Exxon, Chevron, and Gold.

SPEAKER_01

Right. The briefing highlighted Goldman Sachs on gold. They put the fair value at$4,550 with a$5,400 year-end target.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, driven heavily by central bank buying and private sector hedging against all this risk.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, but here's where it gets really interesting. Because while everyone is watching the stock market and oil, there is a hidden financial crack forming.

SPEAKER_00

The shadow burning sector.

SPEAKER_01

Yes. Blue awl capital and private credit. The briefing notes, they just capped private credit fund redemptions at 5%.

SPEAKER_00

Which caused their shares to drop 7% immediately.

SPEAKER_01

I mean, in Q1 alone, they received redemption requests of 40.7% and 21.9% in two of their funds. It's like a slow-motion bank run. But I want to push back on this. Is this actually caused by the war or is this a totally separate crisis?

SPEAKER_00

It's a parallel crisis, honestly. Blue Owl cited war uncertainty, sure, but also fears over AI disruption.

SPEAKER_01

The AI fears.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, investors are terrified. AI is going to make the mid-sized companies they lent money to obsolete. So they're running for the exits. And Michael Hartnett at BOFA explicitly warned that 2026 is starting to pattern match to the mid-2007-2008 financial crisis.

SPEAKER_01

That is genuinely terrifying.

SPEAKER_00

If this redemption panic spreads to other massive direct lenders like Aries or Apollo, it becomes a systemic credit crisis. And it doesn't even need the Middle East to escalate to cause a recession.

SPEAKER_01

Which brings us to the ultimate risk, the 96-hour calendar confluence.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, this is where everything collides.

SPEAKER_01

We've got a geopolitical standoff, a physical oil shortage, a cracking credit system, and in the next 96 hours, the calendar forces them all together.

SPEAKER_00

Tomorrow is a good Friday. Equities are closed.

SPEAKER_01

But the critical March non-farm payrolls report drops anyway.

SPEAKER_00

Right. And without the equity market open to act as a safety valve, the bonds and futures markets are going to react violently.

SPEAKER_01

And then Monday, April 6th. That's the ambiguous Iran energy strike deadline.

SPEAKER_00

Which hits at the exact same time as the physical arrival of the IEA's April supply cliff data. This raises an important question. What happens when three unprecedented high-impact events hit simultaneously while major markets are dark?

SPEAKER_01

The calendar itself becomes a systemic risk. Yeah. It gets wild. And just to throw a wild card into this the ultimate tail risk scenario modeled by oilprice.com, what if the U.S. seizes Carg Island?

SPEAKER_00

I mean, Carg Island handles 90% of Iran's oil exports.

SPEAKER_01

90%. If that infrastructure is physically occupied, we are talking about a multi-year structural removal of oil.

SPEAKER_00

Right, because it's no longer just a naval blockade. Oilprice.com models that Brent Crude could blow past$150 a barrel if that happens.

SPEAKER_01

Unbelievable. So just to synthesize everything we've decoded from Eli Levy's briefing today, the conflict has officially crossed the line. It is no longer just a temporary geopolitical scare.

SPEAKER_00

No, it's a structural supply shock and a macroeconomic stagflation reality.

SPEAKER_01

And that leaves me with a final, pretty provocative thought for you to mull over. We noted that AI disruption fears are already causing a credit panic at Blue Isle Capital, right? Right. Well, this is happening at the exact same time global energy supplies are collapsing. If the AI revolution requires an exponential increase in power for massive data centers, what happens to the tech boom if we are entering a decade of structural energy starvation?

SPEAKER_00

That's the multi-trillion dollar question.

SPEAKER_01

Are we fundamentally mispricing the physical limits of our digital future? Think about that as you watch the markets this week. And on that note, thank you for joining us. Disclaimer Trading futures, options on futures, and retail off exchange foreign currency transactions and other financial instruments involve substantial risk of loss and are not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Carefully consider if trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances, knowledge, and financial resources. You may lose all or more of your initial investment. Opinions, market data, and recommendations are subject to change at any time.